Chapter 12

The Problem

Whomsoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce…and when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate.- James Garfield

Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes the laws.- Mayer Rothschild

Unfortunately, within a few weeks of slamming the moneychangers with the above statement, President James Garfield (1831-1881) was assassinated. Such was the displeasure of the secretive moneychangers, the elite bankers of the world. Garfield paid for this indiscretion with his life. Others who came before and after him would also.

To discover the secret identity of these moneychangers to whom President Garfield referred, we need to revisit our history.

The beginnings of "usury" originated in 200 B.C. Two early Roman emperors lost their lives setting about to reform usury laws by limiting land ownership to 500 acres and freeing up the coinage of that era. In 48 B.C., Julius Caesar took back the power to coin money and made it available to everyone. He was assassinated for his trouble. The common people lost their homes and wealth as we in the twenty-first century are about to.

In the time of Jesus of Nazareth, two thousand years ago, the Sanhedrin of the Jewish temple controlled their flock through temple taxes represented by the payment of the half shekel. There are many historians of this era who estimate that the Sanhedrin temple coffers contained in excess of the equivalent of ten million dollars in half shekels. The Jewish people, oppressed and totally controlled by Sanhedrin temple officials, were simply enslaved to the dogma of this religion and its leaders. As we have seen, Jesus dared to confront and expose this ungodly enslavement of Israel and suffered what can only be described as an assassination.

In the intervening centuries, the moneychangers, practicing the ancient art of usury, experienced an ebb and flow as generation after generation of monarchical and political leaders eradicated this enslaving practice. No sooner was the evil rooted out, then it would reappear under a different guise. Usury would always reappear as the greed and power-lust of the strong overshadowed the weak. In the Middle Ages, the Vatican forbade the charging of interest on loans — usury based on the concept that followed the teachings of Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas — declaring that the purpose of money was to serve the members of society and to facilitate the exchanges of goods needed to lead a virtuous life. The moneychangers used interest on loans to conduct usury. Until recently, all religionists condemned fraud and oppression through the enslavement by these usury techniques.

As the moneychangers became more adept during the ensuing epochs of their history, they became bolder in their manipulations. And so it was seen that the concept of fractional reserve lending sprang up. This widespread fraud has always created the circumstances for widespread poverty and the reduction of the value of money. The modern era’s description of the business cycle is nothing more than the result of the boom and bust response to the fractional reserve lending policies of all banks worldwide. They have simply learned from the past.

Central Banks

The first central bank of any country to exercise fractional reserve lending was the Bank of England, which was formed in 1694 and privately owned by deceptive and fraudulent shareholders who portrayed this money lender’s bank as the people’s bank — it was not. Debt from the Bank of England to every generation since that time, represented by either government or monarchy, was secured against rising taxation of the citizens. The Bank of England model soon became the model for all nations and their banks. Putting the privately owned central bank in charge of a nation’s finances is like placing that nation’s finances under the control of the Mafia.

In the early eighteenth century, fifty years after the doors of the Bank of England opened, there arose a family in Frankfurt, Germany, whose patriarchal head was Amshel Moses Bauer, a goldsmith and money lender. In 1743, using the insignia displayed above his place of business — the Roman Eagle over a red shield, the German term for which is "Rothschild"  — he changed is name to Amshel Moses Rothschild. Rothschild had five sons, and upon their maturity, he sent each of them to the commercial centers of Europe. Amshel, the eldest, stayed in Frankfurt; Solomon went to Vienna; Nathan to London; Carl to Naples; and Jacob to Paris. And so the seeds were sown for the most powerful and wealthiest family in the history of our planet to reign over the next three centuries of human evolution with the single purpose of greed and power, no matter the cost. Generation after generation of the Rothschilds and their appointed accomplices have secretly ruled over society, using their particular brand of moneychanger’s usury — the fractional reserve lending technique.

It was during the Civil War that the conspirators launched their first concrete efforts. Judah Benjamin, chief advisor to Jefferson Davis, was a Rothschild agent. Rothschild agents were planted in Abraham Lincoln’s (1809-1865) cabinet, and tried to sell him into a financial dealing with the House of Rothschild. But Lincoln saw through the scheme and bluntly rejected it, thereby incurring the undying enmity of the Rothschilds. Investigation of Lincoln’s slaying revealed that his assassin was a member of a secret conspiratorial group. The name of the group was never revealed given the number of high-ranking government officials involved. The ending of the Civil War temporarily destroyed all chances for the Rothschilds to lay hold of our money system as they had already acquired in Britain and other nations in Europe.

Shortly after the Civil War, a young immigrant, Jacob H. Schiff, arrived in New York. This son of a Rabbi, born in one of the Rothschild’s houses in Frankfurt, Germany, was on a mission. His instructions were to buy into a banking house in the United States, which was to be the springboard for obtaining control of the U.S. money system. Schiff bought a partnership in a firm that called itself Kuhn and Loeb, a well-known private banking firm.

To achieve his objective, which was to entrap the U.S. money system, Schiff had to get the full cooperation of the big banker elements. This was not an easy task for the small, bewhiskered man from the German ghettos. But Schiff threw a few Rothschild bones to them — the distribution in the United States of desirable European stock issues. Then Schiff discovered he had an even more potent weapon.

It was in the decades following the Civil War that our industries began to burgeon. There were great railroads to build. The oil, mining, steel, and textile industries began to grow. All of this called for great financing, much of which had to come from abroad primarily from the House of Rothschild. Schiff became the patron saint of men like John D. Rockefeller, Edward R. Harriman, and Andrew Carnegie. He financed the Standard Oil Company for Rockefeller, a railroad empire for Harriman, and a steel empire for Carnegie. By the turn of the century, Schiff had tight control of the entire banking fraternity on Wall Street, which by then included the Lehman brothers, Goldman-Sachs, and other international banks headed by men hand-picked by the Rothschilds. In short, Schiff, who was the "boss" in New York, had control of the nation’s money powers. He was ready for the next step: the entrapment of our national money system.

With the five sons geographically established in the financial centers of Europe, the Rothschild family soon attained the reputation as the wealthiest family in the world. The same is true today. They amassed their wealth through their banking practices of fractional reserve lending, by lending vast sums which emanated from the multiplying effect against depositors’ funds, and lending the paper money to kings and governments. Their most cherished practice was then and remains so today the financing of both sides of war, thus guaranteeing the doubling of profit from the interest derived thereof. There is no such thing as partisan or political alignment among the moneychangers; there is merely opportunity for profit.

This Rothschild family soon took control of every privately owned central bank, and with their enormous wealth created the circumstances that would bring about the evolution of the Republic of the United States of America. It was the Bank of England’s oppression of the colonies through taxation and other fiscal manipulations that spurred the revolution which ultimately spawned the U.S.

In answer to the Bank of England as to how the colonies proposed the financing of the new republic, Benjamin Franklin replied: "That is simple. In the colonies we issue our own money. It is called Colonial Script. We issue it in proper proportion to the demands of trade and industry to make the products pass easily from the producers to the consumers. In this manner, creating for ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay to no one."

Since under the U.S. Constitution all control of our money system is solely vested in Congress, Schiff’s next step was to seduce Congress into betraying that constitution edict by surrendering control to the hierarchy of the Illuminati’s great conspiracy. In order to legalize that surrender and make the people powerless to resist it, it would be necessary to have Congress enact special legislation. Schiff had to infiltrate both houses of Congress. How? Through a president without integrity or scruples who would sign that legislation into law.

Over the two centuries from the American Revolution to 1913, several attempts by the Rothschilds and their associates were made to control the printing of money in the United States. Each time these moneychangers established a privately owned state bank, they were rooted out by honest politicians. As stated previously, several of these honest politicians would be assassinated then and since for their trouble because of the single-mindedness and greed of the moneychangers.

By the twentieth century, the moneychangers, represented by the Rothschilds and their greedy associates, had established their central banks and fractional reserve lending practices in Europe. They then turned their full attention to the United States. On December 23, 1913, after all but three senators had returned home for the Christmas break, the greatest act of treason was perpetrated on the American people. Under the stewardship of President Woodrow Wilson, a Democrat who attained office under the guise of never allowing a central bank-related piece of legislation to pass while president, passed the Federal Reserve Act. It provided for a privately owned central bank, disguised as the Federal Reserve System, to not only issue this nation’s currency but to charge interest against that currency. Nothing short of the moneychangers’ ancient practice of usury. How could this have come about?

Ignoring all previous history of the practice of the moneychangers and fractional reserve lending, a cadre of traitors simply set about to conspire with willing accomplices, such as J. P. Morgan (1837-1913), to spur the political circumstances whereby proponents of central bank moneychangers legislated the Federal Reserve Act. They were hand-picked by the Rothschild family and tutored into the mindset that eventually succeeded. Flush with his success in averting a national panic in the early part of the century, J. P. Morgan cast about looking for a future president who would support the idea of a privately owned central bank. He soon found Woodrow Wilson, who was then the president of Princeton University, and set about grooming this traitor for the long-planned and anticipated central bank coup.

The Federal Reserve System was the direct result of this erroneous and shortsighted response by Woodrow Wilson to the previous bank failures during the early part of the century. His support of the J. P. Morgan money trust concept led directly to this act of treason. "All this trouble could be averted if we appointed a committee of six or seven public spirited men like J. P. Morgan to handle the affairs of our country," Woodrow Wilson commented. This outrageous statement brought into focus the exact circumstances upon which the moneychangers would carry out their usurpation of fiscal control over the United States.

A revealing statement made by Representative Charles A. Lindbergh (Republican-Minnesota) (1902-1974) fell on deaf ears: "Those not favorable to the money trust could be squeezed out of business and the people frightened into demanding changes in the banking and currency laws which The Money Trust would frame." The unsuspecting American citizens were herded into the mindset of once again accepting a central bank and economic enslavement.

Senator Nelson Aldrich from Rhode Island became the chairman of the National Monetary Commission, comprising a cadre of traitors and cronies of J. P. Morgan. The purpose of this commission was to study and recommend to Congress changes in the banking system to eliminate problems emanating from the 1907 financial crisis. Aldrich represented the Newport, Rhode Island homes of America’s richest banking families. His daughter married John D. Rockefeller, Junior, and together they had five sons: John, Nelson (who became vice president in 1974), Lawrence, Winthrop, and David, who eventually headed up the Council on Foreign Relations and was the chairman of Chase Manhattan Bank. As soon as the National Monetary Commission was set up, Senator Aldrich set out on a two-year tour of Europe, where he consulted at length with the central bankers in England, France, and Germany. This trip alone cost taxpayers $300,000. An astronomical sum in those days.

Shortly after Aldrich’s return on the evening of November 22, 1910, some of the wealthiest and most powerful men in America boarded his private rail car and in the strictest secrecy journeyed to Jekyll Island off the coast of Georgia. With the group came Paul Warburg. Warburg had been given a $500,000 per year salary by the investment firm Kuhn, Loeb and Company to lobby for the passage of a privately owned central bank in America. Warburg’s partner in this firm was Jacob Schiff, the grandson of the man who shared the Green Shield house with the Rothschild family in Frankfurt, Germany. Schiff was in the process of spending 20 million dollars to finance the overthrow of the czar in Russia. These three European banking families — the Rothschilds, the Schiffs, and the Warburgs — were interconnected by marriage down through the years, just as their American banking counterparts  — the Morgans, Rockefellers and Aldrichs — were. Secrecy was so tight that all seven participating members were cautioned to use only first names in case servants would discover their true identities.

Years later, one participant, Frank Vanderlip, president of National City Bank of New York and a representative of the Rockefeller family, confirmed the Jekyll Island trip. Quoted in the February 9, 1935, edition of the Saturday Evening Post, Vanderlip said: "I was as secretive — indeed, as furtive — as any conspirator…discovery, we knew, simply must not happen, or else all our time and effort would be wasted. If it were to be exposed that our particular group had got together and written a banking bill, that bill would have had no chance whatever of passage by Congress."

The whole purpose of the Jekyll Island meeting was to evolve a secret plan to reintroduce a privately owned central bank to control the finances of the United States. Not for Americans but for the moneychangers of Europe and New York. The lure of fractional bank lending was simply too much for these greedy moneychangers to pass up. This conspiracy to hijack the national economy by the private bankers was necessary in their minds as the competition from smaller state-owned banks was too much to bear. As usual, the strong wished to lord it over the weak.

As Senator Aldrich later admitted, "Before passage of this act, the New York bankers could only dominate the reserves of New York. Now, we are able to dominate the bank reserves of the entire country." John D. Rockefeller put it another way: "Competition is sin."

As the U.S. economy became strong, corporations began to finance their expansions out of profits. Of course, this was counterproductive to the usury practices of the moneychangers. American industries were becoming independent of the moneychangers. Something had to be done. The new name for the central bank was hatched as the Federal Reserve Bank, in one of the conference rooms of what is now known as the Jekyll Island Club Hotel. This new name was designed to give the impression that the Federal Reserve System, as it would later be known, had a dual purpose of stopping bank runs and concealing its monopoly character. With the dispersal of the seven conspirators, the bill was written to give it a monopoly over U.S. currency and create money out of nothing. To see who is truly behind the Federal Reserve Bank to this very day, click on this link: http://www.land.netonecom.net/tlp/ref/federal_reserve.shtml

How does the Fed, as it is commonly called, create money out of nothing? Let us take a look at bonds first. Bonds are simply promises to pay, or government IOUs. People buy bonds to get a secure rate of interest. At the end of the term of the bond, the government repays the bond plus interest, and the bond is destroyed. Presently there are about five trillion dollars worth of these bonds. Here are the four steps the Fed uses to create money out of nothing:

• The Federal Open Market Committee approves the purchase of U.S. bonds on the open market.
• The bonds are purchased by the Federal Reserve Bank.
• The Fed pays for the bonds with electronic credits to the seller’s bank. These credits are based on nothing. The Fed simply creates them.
• The banks use these deposits as reserves. They can loan out more than ten times the amount of their reserves to new borrowers; all are charged interest.

In this way, a Fed purchase of, say, a million dollars’ worth of bonds, gets turned into over ten million dollars in bank accounts. The Fed in effect creates 10 percent of this totally new money, and the banks create the other 90 percent. To reduce the amount of money in the economy, the process is simply reversed. The Fed sells bonds to the public and the money flows out of the purchaser’s bank. Loans must be reduced by ten times the amount of the sale so, a Fed sale of a million dollars in bonds results inten million dollars less money in the economy. So how does this benefit the private bankers who huddled in the conspiracy at Jekyll Island?

• It misdirected banking reform.
• It prevented a proper debt-free system of government finance, such as Lincoln’s Greenbacks, from making a comeback.
• It delegated to the bankers the right to create 90 percent of the U.S. money supply, based on only fractional reserves, which they then loan out at interest.
• It centralized the overall control of the U.S. money supply in the hands of a few men.
• It established a central bank with a high degree of independence from effective political control.

Soon after its creation, the Fed’s great contraction in the early 1930s would cause the Great Depression. This independence has been enhanced since then to additional laws. In order to fool the public into thinking the government retained control, the plan called for the Fed to be run by a board of governors appointed by the president and approved by the senate. The bankers simply had to make sure "their men" were appointed to the board of governors. That wasn’t difficult, given that bankers have money and money buys influence over politicians.

Once the conspirators left Jekyll Island, the public relations blitz was on. The New York bankers put together an "educational fund" of five million dollars to finance professors at selected universities to endorse the new bank.  Woodrow Wilson at Princeton was one of the first to jump on the bank wagon. Their first attempt, known as the Aldrich Bill, was unsuccessful and quickly identified by astute politicians as the "Banker’s Bill," a bill to benefit only what became as known as the "money trust." As Congressman Lindbergh put it during the congressional debate, "The Aldrich Plan is the Wall Street Plan. It means another panic, if necessary, to intimidate the people. Aldrich, paid by the government to represent the people, proposes a plan for the trusts instead."

Realizing they did not have the votes to carry the day, the Republican leadership scrapped the Aldrich Bill and the New York bankers moved to track two, the Democrats. They began financing Woodrow Wilson as the Democratic nominee. As respected historian James Perloff put it, Wall Street financier Bernard Baruch was charged with the responsibility of tutoring Woodrow Wilson. Said Perloff:  "Baruch brought Wilson to the Democratic Party Headquarters in New York in 1912, ‘leading him like one would a poodle on a string.’ Wilson received an ‘indoctrination course’ from the leaders convened there…."

The stage was set. The moneychangers of Europe were poised to install their privately owned central bank once again. The battle to control the finances of America had been raging since the time of Andrew Jackson. William Jennings Bryan had led the hard-core group of Jacksonians who stood between the moneychangers and their goal. With Bryan leading the charge, these opponents of the moneychangers, ignorant of Baruch’s tutelage, now threw themselves behind Democrat Woodrow Wilson. They and Bryan would soon be betrayed.

During the presidential campaign, the Democrats were careful to pretend to oppose the Aldrich Bill. As Representative Louis McFadden, himself a Democrat (Pennsylvania) as well as chairman of the House Banking and Currency Committee explained twenty years after the fact, "The Aldrich Bill was condemned in the platform…when Woodrow Wilson was nominated….The men who ruled the Democrat Party promised the people that if they were returned to power there would be no central bank established here while they held the reins of government. Thirteen months later, that promise was broken, and the Wilson administration, under the tutelage of those sinister Wall Street figures who stood behind Colonel House, established here in our free country the worm-eaten monarchical institution of the ‘king’s bank’ to control us from the top downwards, and to shackle us from the cradle to the grave."

After Wilson was elected, Morgan, Warburg, Baruch, and company advanced a new plan, which Warburg named the Federal Reserve System. The democratic leadership hailed the new bill, calling it the Glass Owen Bill and touting it as something radically different from the Aldrich Bill. In fact the bill was identical in every important detail. So vehement were the democratic denials of similarity that Paul Warburg, the father of both bills, had to step in to reassure his paid friends in congress that the two bills were virtually identical. Warburg explained, "Brushing aside the external differences affecting the ‘shells,’ we find the ‘kernels’ of the two systems very closely resembling and related to one another."

And so it transpired on December 22, 1913, at 11 p.m. that, under the shepherding of President Wilson and certain congressmen of both sides of the political spectrum and with just a quorum of three senators present, the Federal Reserve Act passed without dissent. Earlier that day, Congressman Lindbergh had warned:

"This Act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth. When the President signs this bill, the invisible government by the Monetary Power will be legalized. The people may not know it immediately, but the day of reckoning is only a few years removed…The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking bill."

This blatant act of treason played out in a long and bitter dispute between the European moneychangers and the honest politicians. Fractional reserve lending was forever the desire of the usury merchants of the moneychangers and nothing has changed.

There was one other piece of the usury puzzle that the manipulators needed and that was the unfettered right for their agents and fellow conspirators to be able to tax the people to pay the interest on their usury loans to the government. The Constitution, as it had been designed, not only precluded the federal government from making any law but also from imposing any  taxes on the people. This was the exclusive domain of the states — as the founding fathers anticipated later treachery by greedy and powerful men.

Only weeks earlier, Congress had passed a bill legalizing income tax. (There remains serious doubt as to whether it was ever correctly ratified.)  The private central bank — the Federal Reserve System —  needed a foolproof system of taxation in order to run up huge debt and be assured of the interest being paid. The moneychangers knew from experience that the only guarantee worth anything was the right of the debtor nation to tax the people. In 1895, the Supreme Court had found a similar income tax law to be unconstitutional, so it was necessary to fix the problem. Once again Senator Aldrich came to the rescue and indoctrinated his associates in congress that a new taxation bill was necessary. Politicians succumbed to his sophistry. Little did they know that what they had voted for was the missing piece of the moneychangers’ puzzle for domination of the United States of America, as it was for all nations worldwide.

By October 1913, Senator Aldrich had hustled the new income tax bill through Congress even though three-quarters of the states had failed to pass the legislation. This piece of legislative contrivance was absolutely necessary to the moneychangers’ master plan for the United States, and they were in no mood to accept defeat. Without the federal government’s right to collect taxes, the moneychangers' interest on mounting debt would be at risk. This scenario was repeated in every nation during the twentieth century until each one was a debtor nation, guaranteeing the moneychangers their interest payments from the government's taxation collection laws.

As we review the history of this century, and that of the United States of America in particular, we are able to see clearly how the sinister shadow of greedy and powerful people have manipulated the world’s agenda. The practice of financing both sides of disputing forces became an art form that pitted communism/socialism against capitalism, religion against religion, and race against race. All the while, the stateless, nationless, and godless moneychangers were firmly in control of their agenda. They financed one group through fractional reserve lending, then when that side was sufficiently heated and ready for battle, they financed the opposing side and let them tear into one another until they expended their resources and young men. Both sides would soon realize the folly of their disputation; by that time, however, they were well ensnared by and indebted to the moneychangers. The only solution was to construct new and more taxes to satisfy the usury interest payments.

It is easy to see the clear picture of this fraud. The risk to the moneychangers was minimal, as the loans were merely made using paper money created by the fractional reserve system. This became even easier to apply with the advent of computers, which simply created additional zeros for lending purposes. The citizens of debtor nations were the collateral as long as they continued to pay their taxes and remained compliant to the will of the government of the day. This is how the moneychangers of Europe held sway over the unsuspecting masses of civilization and continue to this day.

Now that the problem is in focus, we can begin to analyze the various defining moments of this century and apportion the blame where it rightly belongs.

Let us start with World War I. How did the moneychangers figure in this conflict? This war was essentially between Russia and Germany. France and England were unwilling participants; however, both countries had members of the Rothschild family in secret control of the central banks enslaving them and their colonies. Thus, it was that the moneychangers, using their inflammatory techniques, created the conflict. They financed both sides and just sat back and waited. When both ides had spilled enough blood and tired of fighting, the moneychangers simply sat down with both sides and worked out a taxation deal that would service the debt.

World War II went the same way. The Fed’s great contraction of money in the 1930s spread throughout the world and created the so-called Great Depression. Roosevelt bankrupted the U.S. economy, carrying out the moneychangers’ wishes. By 1939, all sides of the abrasion were suffering terribly and itching for a fight. The moneychangers simply financed both sides and waited. The Manhattan Project, which ended the war, was their coup de gras, the icing on the cake — for it would give birth to the Cold War, the ultimate financing scam for the moneychangers.

The Korean War, the assassination of president Kennedy, Vietnam war, and the rest of the Cold War are just examples of more fractional reserve lending practices that were now fully under the global control of the moneychangers. By the end of our century, all parties — our creditor bankers — were severely bankrupted. The elite family groups are patiently waiting for their overall plan to come to fruition with the introduction of their New World Order — total domination of a slave society globally.

There was, however, a major problem and threat to the Industrial Military Complex and the coming Cold War:  the unexpected Roswell, New Mexico incident in 1947. The immediate response was cover-up; under no circumstances were the masses to be exposed to this paradigm-shifting event. If people panicked, as the social engineers posited, they may revolt and refuse to pay their taxes. The moneychangers could not risk that and the order was obeyed by the U.S. military to effect an immediate cover-up. An ongoing back-engineering program was devised, using the moneychangers’ controlled Industrial Military Complex corporations globally. The landscape becomes clear once readers know their history.

The extraterrestrial cover-up was first perpetrated by U.S. traitors to humanity. It then involved every major nation on both sides of the philosophical and ideological spectrum. Control of the masses was and is the agenda, for without same our civilization would have to change with the realization of extraterrestrial visits, using UFO devices capable of long space travel and by inference, technology that makes ours look like child’s play. This pecking order concept of the strong and powerful controlling the meek and mild is nothing more than the reptilian heredity breaking through the neocortex of the partially civilized hominid brain.

Picture this: A UFO crashes as a result of an electromagnetic flux in the desert of New Mexico. The military is instructed to recover the bodies, one of which is shot dead by a spooked soldier. All the aliens, one still partially alive, are then taken back to Roswell where they are autopsied in secret and a report is made. The UFO artifacts are harvested by military intelligence, then, over the next decade these harvested "parts" are secretly distributed for back-engineering projects to the friends of the moneychangers, the corporations of the Industrial Military Complex. Apart from the initial press release by a military officer in Roswell, the whole thing is hushed up, witnesses threatened and a screen of secrecy placed over this whole affair.

Any decent investigator would quickly deduce that not only were the authorities aware of the possibility of a UFO incident, but had a contingency plan for it. How many such incidents involving either our military or NASA projects have been monitored since? If Colonel Corso is to be believed, the answer is that a conspiracy and act of betrayal by our world authorities has been going on for more than fifty years. A Cosmic Watergate, which has involved the suppression of world-shattering news. Murder, deceit, and treason have been perpetrated under the command of greedy and manipulative moneychangers.

This is precisely the same set of circumstances that prevailed during the era of Jesus of Nazareth 2,000 years ago. This teacher of men confronted the moneychangers and the Sanhedrin of the Jewish temple by declaring their greedy ways were unrighteous and wrong. Their immediate response was to murder him. The same mindset of 2,000 years ago was enacted in 1947. The greedy moneychangers, faced with the threat of losing control of the masses and the world governments' right to collect taxes, simply made it disappear. Like all conspiracies, it began to reappear and was finally uncovered by Colonel Corso, one of their former accomplices. The Cosmic Watergate is now uncovered before the media’s derision and argument — the response by automatons — as to whether Corso is lying.

Once the first acts of treason against humanity had been enacted, the behavior of authorities worldwide was no longer fettered by virtue. The propensity to lie and deceive became endemic, much the same as habitual criminal behavior. Their ability to cover theirtracks using the "Cold War" and their commonly held view concerning "national security" was the perfect smoke screen for criminality and the attempted introduction of the New World Order. The NWO, as it would become known on the Internet, is the final piece of the puzzle, the master plan of the Rothschild-inspired domination of the masses by economic slavery. After 2,000 years of the current dispensation, the inhabitants of earth will shortly be faced with a question: Luciferian or Jesusonian?

A great decision is soon to be asked of the people of our planet: whether they wish more of the same greed and power-lust exercised by a few powerful moneychangers; or a new way — the matchless example of the Jesusonian portrayed by Jesus of Nazareth almost 2,000 years ago. He taught the people of His time love and brotherhood — the Fatherhood of God and the brotherhood of man. Are we sufficiently civilized to make the right decision individually, collectively, and for our future generations? Only time will tell.

One thing is undeniable — the present societies of the modern civilization will not survive in their present state. The problem is now out of control. What the world needs now is to see Jesus living once again through spirit-born men and women who will courageously seek to live as He lived in perfect harmony and in service of His fellows. Did anyone read where Jesus of Nazareth taught to seek revenge, to control through greed, or for the strong to oppress the weak? Is it written that His life-giving teachings were meant to be turned into a sect-divided cult, which seeks to lord it over all other religions and cults?

These questions will be part of the great decision our modern civilization will be forced to make if we are to overcome the problem of being endowed with a reptilian-evolved brain that is capable of savagery and barbarism the likes of which we have had but a partial glimpse.

Every institution of our modern era has been subverted by a century of a long and vicious struggle between the combatants of the pecking order. In the middle of this struggle has been the people. Innocent of the real agendas, they are victims of a small cadre of moneychangers and their perverted agent provocateurs. As a human race, we must coalesce, allowing for a higher consciousness to develop whereby greed, fear, power, revenge, and control are not our motivating responses to the problem. But first we must remove the debilitating effect of the moneychangers and their agents — the idiots, the lawyers, and the politicians.

We must attain wisdom through a spiritual renaissance.